Wednesday, December 29, 2010
I don't understand...
Sunday, December 26, 2010
"Which hospital are you delivering at?"
"Oh we homebirth with a midwife. I know... we're kind of crazy..." (Not that I believe we are crazy - but I know to a majority of the population we appear that way. It kind of diffuses the conversation at that point and most people move on... unless they are truly interested, which in that case I'm happy to talk about it :)
Tuesday, November 23, 2010
Here we go...
- After learning that there is no medical indication for it (doesn't reduce infection, little to no effect on STD's, etc.), along with the fact that no medical organization in the entire world recommends routine infant circumcision, along with the fact that it is being done less and less in our country -- With no BENEFIT (quite the OPPOSITE) to putting my brand new, perfect little baby through pain of surgery - cutting a part off of his perfectly formed little body, I just couldn't imagine, couldn't fathom!, putting my baby through it. With all of the statistics showing no benefit, many insurance companies have deemed it what it really is (and therefore many companies no longer cover it) - an elective cosmetic surgery.
- In addition to there being no medical benefit to circumcision, there are many risks involved, as there is with any surgery. Hemorrhage, infection and death are some immediate risks; there can also be ongoing and permanent complications. Death from circumcision may be one of the most common causes of death in babies, sadly it often goes unreported or is covered up. (Edited to add: It's estimated that as many boys die from infant circumcision as SIDS every year... SIDS is not always preventable - that we are yet aware of - but circumcision deaths are 100% preventable).
Ugh... this topic is so big and I have so much to say about what I have learned, it's really overwhelming to write this.... - The basics of the procedure: The prepuce (foreskin) of the penis is fused to the glans (head of the penis) at birth, much like your fingernail is fused to your finger. The skin eventually releases when the boy is older, 50% don't until 10 years old or later. In order to perform the circumcision, the skin must be torn apart. Forget the cutting - this has GOT to be the most painful part of the procedure (especially considering the millions of nerve endings in this sensitive part of the body!). This is something I didn't know about until researching. There are different ways of completing the circumcision once the skin has been torn apart, I won't go into that, but you can google the procedures if you like. I'm sure they are likely equally painful (although we'll never really know since our babies are too little to communicate). And remember, little to no anesthesia is used as it is too dangerous to use with a baby.
- I have heard so many times - "do it when they are little so they won't remember the pain." Whether this is true or not (that they don't remember pain)... I just don't understand how this makes it okay?? They are brand new and have experienced little to no pain in their short lives. Some reports even say that their nervous systems are HYPER aware in the beginning. To me, the fact that they can't tell you it hurts and you can't give them any pain relievers makes the whole thing so much more awful! Poor babies...
- "It's cleaner and / or easier to care for": Before the foreskin retracts on it's own, there is nothing different to be done. You never never never forcibly retract a foreskin. Only clean what is seen. This requires no more effort - and definitely less than a newly circumcised penis. (Check out FAQ's about care). Once the foreskin retracts, the parent shows the boy how to pull it up in the shower and let the water run over it. This is maybe different in mechanics, but little girls need to know how to clean themselves as well. And if a we are cutting little boys to be "cleaner" we should cut little girls labia off too - it would be cleaner! And they would be less prone to UTI's (girls are much more prone to infections than boys). We would never fathom cutting our little girls in the name of cleanliness. Or removing their mammary glands so they might avoid cancer in the future. Our boys deserve the same respect.
- "We want him to look like daddy" - First of all, if daddy had a missing arm, you wouldn't cut off your baby's arm so he "looked like daddy" would you? Of course not! I have never heard of any men/boys comparing genitals with their father/sons. As women, we don't compare breasts or labia with our daughters. Yes, it is a possibility (maybe even an eventuality) that our uncircumcised boy will ask why he looks different. We will explain to him, just as we would if daddy had a missing arm (age appropriately of course). The same would go for brothers (if one were intact and the other was not). If my mom had a mastectomy, I would probably have asked about that, but never wished my breast away so I could look like her.
- As far as biblical circumcision - it was a much different procedure than what is done today."It's true circumcision was a sign of the covenant God made with Abraham, but today's procedure is not the same procedure! In Abraham's day only enough of the foreskin was removed to expose the tip of the glans (or, the 'head'). The Maccabees, during their famous revolt against the Greek domination of the Jews, changed it to the procedure known today and forced it on all Jewish men on pain of death. In the New Testament, the Apostles announced (Acts chapter fifteen) that the ordinances of the Law of Moses were no longer required."It was a blood sacrifice. There was a little nick to the boys penis and a drop of blood was taken. That was it. Anything more and boys of that day probably would have been dying left and right from blood loss and infection. The reason why it is unnecessary for us to do this now as a Christian is the same reason we don't sacrifice lambs as burnt offerings, etc. - Jesus was the final and ultimate sacrifice. We are no longer under the law, we are under the blood of Christ.
Friday, November 12, 2010
Two of Our Most Controversial Parenting Decisions
Midwives
Friday, October 29, 2010
Pregnant or hope to be someday?

Wednesday, October 27, 2010
Birth and the Two Models of Care
The Midwives Model of Care is based on the fact that pregnancy and birth are normal life processes.
The Midwives Model of Care includes:
- Monitoring the physical, psychological, and social well-being of the mother throughout the childbearing cycle
- Providing the mother with individualized education, counseling, and prenatal care, continuous hands-on assistance during labor and delivery, and postpartum support
- Minimizing technological interventions
- Identifying and referring women who require obstetrical attention
The application of this woman-centered model of care has been proven to reduce the incidence of birth injury, trauma, and cesarean section.
Copyright (c) 1996-2008, Midwifery Task Force, Inc., All Rights Reserved.
http://cfmidwifery.org/mmoc/define.aspx
I couldn't find a definition of the medical model of care, but I found this table making some comparisons of the two models:
Midwives Model of Care Medical Model of Care Definition: Definition: • Birth is a social event, a normal part of a woman's life.
• Birth is the work of the woman and her family.
• The woman is a person experiencing a life-transforming event.• Childbirth is a potentially pathological process.
• Birth is the work of doctors, nurses, midwives and other experts.
• The woman is a patient.Definition: Definition: • Home or other familiar surroundings.
• Informal system of care.• Hospital, unfamiliar territory to the woman
• Bueaucratic, hierarchical system of careDefinition: Definition: • See birth as a holistic process
• Shared decision-making between caregivers and birthing woman
• No class distinction between birthing women and caregivers
• Equal relationship
• Information shared with an attitude of personal caring.
• Longer, more in-depth prenatal visits
• Often strong emotional support
• Familiar language and imagery used
• Awareness of spiritual significance of birth
• Believes in integrity of birth, uses technology if appropriate and proven• Trained to focus on the medical aspects of birth
• "Professional" care that is authoritarian
• Often a class distinction between obstetrician and patients
• Dominant-subordinate relationship
• Information about health, disease and degree of risk not shared with the patient adequately.
• Brief, depersonalized care
• Little emotional support
• Use of medical language
• Spiritual aspects of birth are ignored or treated as embarrassing
• Values technology, often without proof that it improves birth outcome
http://www.morningstarbirth.com/index.cfm?event=pageview&contentPieceID=3225